Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

***brotherjohnf*** · 03-03-2012, 03:58 PM

Was Andrew Breitbart assassinated? What do you think?

***Honey*** · 03-03-2012, 04:27 PM

Good question! Wouldn't surprise me one bit. The timing of the whole thing....

I just read up on some of this last night and it is definately an interesting story! I must admit that I hadn't heard of him before until all this broke. What was he thinking by announcing prior that he had some damming evidence. He just couldn't keep it under wraps until he released it? There are all sorts of ideas about what is in the video. What do you think is in it? "O" saying he is a foreign student which would make him uneligible to be POTUS? Lord... then Biden whould be!

They are saying that it will be released in the next week or so... but who has it now and do you think it will be scrubbed clean? Probably show "O" taking care of some homeless kitttens or somthing like that?

victor kruger · 03-03-2012, 04:41 PM

Just goes to show, if your going to whistle blow you just do it and dont threaten to. Best form of protection is to throw it out there for all to see as you make an announcement and at the same time make it clear if you disappear or end up dead this is why etc etc ... make it clear and loud and put what you have out there with no warning...

Yes imo he was silenced

pops · 03-03-2012, 04:51 PM

Yes, I believe he likely was silenced, but as long as football and American Idol are available, most people won't know anything about him or what he had to say.

03-04-2012, 01:54 AM

Yes, most definitely.

[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ3ZAScJ9RW8Xcy93PwWT9...6xrV8OX6JQ]

03-04-2012, 07:20 AM

I would say its possible the dark shadows got him. That is how the left plays. If Breitbart had such tapes that would be more then a thorn in their side. It would put quite a dent in their homeboy and i'm positive they cannot have that. It will be interesting to see if the video tapes ever do surface, i would say it is probable the videos are now gone forever never to be seen again. It also would mean that the O has already won the election. Confused

I'm sure you guys and gals have seen AJ's take on things. He brings up the fact that whitney houston, Michel Jackson, and others that have suddenly died that the coroner always takes a week or so to announce cause of death where'as Breitbart was pronounced dead of Natural causes just hours after his death. A healthy 40 year old just drops dead.. hummm - AJ also brings in the fact O signed NDAA under the cover of deceptive tactics. NDAA is a where the government does not need to charge you nor arrest you, no trials, no jury's, nada and can silence you no questions asked, never to be heard from again. Is Breitbart a test run? Could be.
Who's next? Game on, the game of Wack-a-Mole. Sad

pops · 03-04-2012, 08:21 AM

"That is how the left plays." --Chronic

Chronic, you delude yourself if you subscribe to the left/right nonsense. It's not a football game and your "team" is not pure. But like football the left/right thing is theater for the ignorant masses. Don't be so desperate to grab something of value from the writhing pile of maggots. It's ALL maggots.

Your awakening is not complete, but you're halfway there.

cosmyccowboy · 03-04-2012, 08:23 AM

yes...

03-04-2012, 08:40 AM

(03-04-2012 08:21 AM)pops Wrote: "That is how the left plays." --Chronic

Chronic, you delude yourself if you subscribe to the left/right nonsense. It's not a football game and your "team" is not pure. But like football the left/right thing is theater for the ignorant masses. Don't be so desperate to grab something of value from the writhing pile of maggots. It's ALL maggots.

Your awakening is not complete, but you're halfway there.

My awaking is pretty close if its not! Big Grin

Besides i don't have a Team. And yes if your speaking of left and right being the political farce, then yes i could just as easy say "That is how the right plays" and i will still be right, or wrong depending on what team you look at it from. I will try n watch it, thanks for the reminder..... Tongue

Skybird · 03-04-2012, 12:36 PM

Was Andrew Breitbart assassinated? Probably. Few things are as they appear. Question everything.

KYnyts · 03-04-2012, 10:44 PM

Why would they bother? Look at all of the documented facts already available about this president and his connections. The courts won't entertain the idea that he isn't Constitutionally qualified. MSM won't cover anything negative about him. Congress doesn't blink an eye, and a good portion of the American people work very hard at at ignoring any discrepancies.

The man presented a fake birth certificate to the American people. Whether or not that is indicative of him being born in another country is open to debate, but no one denies that he has killed Americans who had never been charged with any crime (including a 16 year old boy). No one denies that Congress has abdicated its responsibilities by handing authority over to the executive branch and expanding executive power. This is all out in the open, making it increasingly clear that it doesn't really matter if he was born in Kenya or on the moon. It wouldn't matter if he was Osama bin Laden's brother and a member of Al Qaeda. No one is going to do a thing about it. I know you guys must have noticed that they aren't even paying lip service to the Constitution anymore. So again, why would they bother killing Mr. Brietbart?

How's this for a first post? Smile

***brotherjohnf*** · 03-04-2012, 11:09 PM

(03-04-2012 10:44 PM)KYnyts Wrote: Why would they bother? Look at all of the documented facts already available about this president and his connections. The courts won't entertain the idea that he isn't Constitutionally qualified. MSM won't cover anything negative about him. Congress doesn't blink an eye, and a good portion of the American people work very hard at at ignoring any discrepancies.

The man presented a fake birth certificate to the American people. Whether or not that is indicative of him being born in another country is open to debate, but no one denies that he has killed Americans who had never been charged with any crime (including a 16 year old boy). No one denies that Congress has abdicated its responsibilities by handing authority over to the executive branch and expanding executive power. This is all out in the open, making it increasingly clear that it doesn't really matter if he was born in Kenya or on the moon. It wouldn't matter if he was Osama bin Laden's brother and a member of Al Qaeda. No one is going to do a thing about it. I know you guys must have noticed that they aren't even paying lip service to the Constitution anymore. So again, why would they bother killing Mr. Brietbart?

How's this for a first post?

Good points

victor kruger · 03-05-2012, 10:11 AM

(03-04-2012 10:44 PM)KYnyts Wrote: Why would they bother? Look at all of the documented facts already available about this president and his connections. The courts won't entertain the idea that he isn't Constitutionally qualified. MSM won't cover anything negative about him. Congress doesn't blink an eye, and a good portion of the American people work very hard at at ignoring any discrepancies.

The man presented a fake birth certificate to the American people. Whether or not that is indicative of him being born in another country is open to debate, but no one denies that he has killed Americans who had never been charged with any crime (including a 16 year old boy). No one denies that Congress has abdicated its responsibilities by handing authority over to the executive branch and expanding executive power. This is all out in the open, making it increasingly clear that it doesn't really matter if he was born in Kenya or on the moon. It wouldn't matter if he was Osama bin Laden's brother and a member of Al Qaeda. No one is going to do a thing about it. I know you guys must have noticed that they aren't even paying lip service to the Constitution anymore. So again, why would they bother killing Mr. Brietbart?

How's this for a first post?

1 It's an election year and he has to go to the people again, any new information that goes against is hardly going to encourage voters and I don't think its going to be a landslide win for Obama and his camp knows it. Why risk losing any votes when you don't have to ?

2. Damage limitation rule, smart or not its usually the policy.

3. Because psychopaths do things just because they can, especially megalomaniac ones that are in fear of losing any shred of power.

4 Because right now Briebart was/is insignificant and its better to take these people out before others take too much notice. They have learnt from the 60s/ 70s its far easier to remove a threat early than it is later plus now people would question it far more than back then, and they know it.

KYnyts · 03-05-2012, 01:17 PM

(03-05-2012 10:11 AM)victor kruger Wrote: 1 It's an election year and he has to go to the people again, any new information that goes against is hardly going to encourage voters and I don't think its going to be a landslide win for Obama and his camp knows it. Why risk losing any votes when you don't have to ?

I have come to believe that the elections don't really matter that much in the overall scheme of things and the powers that be could really care less if it is a Democrat or a Republican in office. Only those who will continue down the same path will be permitted to take office. That is why we have seen a continuation of the Bush policies in the Obama presidency. If Mitt Romney is elected, we will see a continuation of the Obama/Bush policies. That is self-evident from Romney's record, from Romney Care, supporting legislation like the NDAA, warmongering to bailouts, and so forth. Really the only differences between Romney & Obama are marginal, and pertain almost completely to social issues...or so it seems to me.

(03-05-2012 10:11 AM)victor kruger Wrote: 2. Damage limitation rule, smart or not its usually the policy.

Historically I would have agreed with you, but Breitbart's claims were nothing new. There are any number of people who have presented information that is discrediting to the president.

(03-05-2012 10:11 AM)victor kruger Wrote: 3. Because psychopaths do things just because they can, especially megalomaniac ones that are in fear of losing any shred of power.

LAUGHS! On this point, I wholeheartedly agree. You might have just won the argument based upon this point alone.

(03-05-2012 10:11 AM)victor kruger Wrote: 4 Because right now Briebart was/is insignificant and its better to take these people out before others take too much notice. They have learnt from the 60s/ 70s its far easier to remove a threat early than it is later plus now people would question it far more than back then, and they know it.

I think our society is very different than it was in the 60s & 70s. Also, why are people like Sheriff Joe, Orly Taitz and Alex Jones still walking around? They are simply written off as conspiracy nuts, not killed.

All that being said, I have no idea if someone had Mr. Breitbart killed or not. The timing strikes me as more than a little odd, as well as the immediate announcement that cause of death was natural, but truth is sometimes stranger than fiction. I'm not arguing that it didn't happen, but am just not convinced that it did.

Then again...if President Obama turns out to have been placed into office through a fraud perpetrated upon the American people and he is indeed a puppet for some type of communist/socialist/fascist "shadow government", it will be far reaching in that the group behind him might be exposed. Hmmmm...I really suck at conspiracy theories. I'm rather new to these concepts, so please be patient while I wrap my mind around some really bizarre ideas. Smile

Farmerbrown · 03-05-2012, 01:34 PM

Yes he was. Count on it.
Who cares ? He was an ass anyway.
All of the celebrity's who play the L/R paradime are asses.
I voted for Dems for years.
Lot of good that did me. Repubs would have been no better.
Now I vote with rounds and 90% coins. Regularly and in volume.
American politics is a fools game.

victor kruger · 03-05-2012, 02:20 PM

(03-05-2012 01:34 PM)Farmerbrown Wrote: Yes he was. Count on it.
Who cares ? He was an ass anyway.
All of the celebrity's who play the L/R paradime are asses.
I voted for Dems for years.
Lot of good that did me. Repubs would have been no better.
Now I vote with rounds and 90% coins. Regularly and in volume.
American politics is a fools game.

You should care, why ? because if you don't then your no better than the fools in the political Arena.Whatever your political beliefs or strategy, vote or not, comply or don't but.... when you cease to care you become less than what you are and that is what some wish, it is easy to manipulate someone who doesn't care and is exactly the means that have been used to gather such power.

Bob-bullion · 03-05-2012, 02:26 PM

They would bother to kill him simply because they can. And in the study of history, sooner or later, when there is a vacuum of right and wrong; might makes right.

03-05-2012, 03:53 PM

(03-05-2012 01:34 PM)Farmerbrown Wrote: Yes he was. Count on it.
Who cares ? He was an ass anyway.
All of the celebrity's who play the L/R paradime are asses.
I voted for Dems for years.
Lot of good that did me. Repubs would have been no better.
Now I vote with rounds and 90% coins. Regularly and in volume.
American politics is a fools game.

You should care, you could be next.
And by not voting you are doing exactly what they want. Handing over more of your rights!

KYnyts · 03-05-2012, 04:11 PM

(03-05-2012 03:53 PM)Chronic Wrote: You should care, you could be next.
And by not voting you are doing exactly what they want. Handing over more of your rights!

Have you seen the documentary "Hacking Democracy"? It is on YouTube and I saw it last week for the first time. Now admittedly, that is just one source, but if taken with the many other instances of voter fraud that have been documented on video tape, it is enough to make one wonder if it matters whether one votes or not. After all, does it matter if one has a right to vote if they are only permitted to vote for one of two choices that have been carefully selected by someone other than the people, both of whom represent basically the same thing (status quo)?

In the past, I have believed that the amount of fraud in elections, if any, was probably negligible. I'm no longer sure that is the case. When you have primaries where votes are thrown away, large numbers of people who are turned away because there isn't enough room, and other shenanigans going on, I think it has a stifling effect on democracy. I am currently of the opinion that this really only comes into play in federal elections, so I do think it is important to vote on a local level.

I have to confess, I'm very conflicted on the voting issue right now. I will vote in November, but there is a good possibility the candidate I vote for may not even be on the ballot.

I am SO sorry for contributing to this thread hijacking, but it sort of ties in to the topic, right?

03-05-2012, 04:31 PM

(03-05-2012 04:11 PM)KYnyts Wrote:
(03-05-2012 03:53 PM)Chronic Wrote: You should care, you could be next.
And by not voting you are doing exactly what they want. Handing over more of your rights!

Have you seen the documentary "Hacking Democracy"? It is on YouTube and I saw it last week for the first time. Now admittedly, that is just one source, but if taken with the many other instances of voter fraud that have been documented on video tape, it is enough to make one wonder if it matters whether one votes or not. After all, does it matter if one has a right to vote if they are only permitted to vote for one of two choices that have been carefully selected by someone other than the people, both of whom represent basically the same thing (status quo)?

In the past, I have believed that the amount of fraud in elections, if any, was probably negligible. I'm no longer sure that is the case. When you have primaries where votes are thrown away, large numbers of people who are turned away because there isn't enough room, and other shenanigans going on, I think it has a stifling effect on democracy. I am currently of the opinion that this really only comes into play in federal elections, so I do think it is important to vote on a local level.

I have to confess, I'm very conflicted on the voting issue right now. I will vote in November, but there is a good possibility the candidate I vote for may not even be on the ballot.

I am SO sorry for contributing to this thread hijacking, but it sort of ties in to the topic, right?

No KYnyts i can't say i have seen it. But i will make a note of it to check it out when i get some time. Maybe you can post it in the video forum? There is defiantly voter fraud, remember Acorn? There is also candidacy fraud, can you say Brocko! I will hand write "Ron Paul" on the ballet if i have to, and i will TRY to vote pro business. No certain party....

Silver Wilbur · 03-06-2012, 08:23 AM

(03-03-2012 04:51 PM)pops Wrote: Yes, I believe he likely was silenced, but as long as football and American Idol are available, most people won't know anything about him or what he had to say.

Very sad Pops but oh so true. Our education system hasn't help matters either with the indoctrination of the students into socialism. Not to mention the left developing a society of "I want it free" sheeple.

boyfromdixie · 03-07-2012, 11:11 AM

victor kruger · 03-07-2012, 12:44 PM

+1 Enough said ...........

***Honey*** · 03-07-2012, 05:31 PM

The Obama tapes from Andrew Breitbart are going to be shown tonight on Hannity (FOX) at 9:00pm. Set the DVR's!

03-07-2012, 05:41 PM

(03-07-2012 05:31 PM)Honey Wrote: The Obama tapes from Andrew Breitbart are going to be shown tonight on Hannity (FOX) at 9:00pm. Set the DVR's!

I was just going to mention this Honey, but ya beat me to it.. Thanks. Tongue

I bet it'll be good. Wink