Silver For The People

Silver stackers by buying physical silver can end the silver manipulation and stop the criminal banksters
eVuln.com

Donate Via Paypal

Donate Via Bitcoin

1KDMja8Jwf2E42zp7KoK6ypmT5c36yNx7E
Berkey Water Filters

Disclaimer

ALL CONTENT ON 'SILVER FOR THE PEOPLE' AS WELL AS THE 'BROTHERJOHNF' YOUTUBE CHANNEL IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. 'SILVER FOR THE PEOPLE' ASSUMES ALL INFORMATION TO BE TRUTHFUL AND RELIABLE; HOWEVER, THE CONTENT ON THIS SITE IS PROVIDED WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. NO MATERIAL HERE CONSTITUTES "INVESTMENT ADVICE" NOR IS IT A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY OR SELL ANY FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO STOCKS, COMMODITIES, OPTIONS, BONDS, FUTURES, OR BULLION. ACTIONS YOU UNDERTAKE AS A CONSEQUENCE OF ANY ANALYSIS, OPINION OR ADVERTISEMENT ON THIS SITE ARE YOUR SOLE RESPONSIBILITY.
Emergency Essentials/BePrepared

Revolver Maps

Map
LifeStraw Personal Water Filter - $19.95
Retail Price: $29.95
You Save: $10.00
from: Eartheasy.com LifeStraw Personal Water Filter

Donate Via Paypal

Donate Via Bitcoin

1KDMja8Jwf2E42zp7KoK6ypmT5c36yNx7E

Why the China Bulls Should Watch Their Chairs

feature photo

dailyreckoning.com.au / By Greg Canavan / January 30th, 2013

It’s come to our sleep deprived attention (we’ve got a one-month old in da house) that one Dr Alex Cowie, our colleague who writes over at Money Morning, is sticking it to the China bears. Being the biggest China bear in the office, it’s slowly dawned on your somnambulist editor who the Doc is having a go at.

Which is fine by us. It’s all good natured. And we welcome criticism…even veiled criticism! When someone challenges your position it makes you think about your arguments. That’s especially the case when you make your arguments public, as we’ve done with China’s economy for much of 2012.

As the old adage goes, different views and opinions are what make a market. And while it might be confusing to you that two people in the same office, working for the same company, can have polar opposite views, we would argue that’s exactly what an independent publisher should be aiming for.

There’s no such thing as a ‘house’ view here. That type of straightjacketed idiocy is for large organisations who like to tell their employees what to think. We always chuckle when someone from some ‘institution’ writes, for example, a controversial op-ed piece or something similar in the media. Then as a footnote, they make it clear that the views are their own and in no way associated with their ‘organisation’.

So after cleansing themselves of independent thought, they plug back in to their official position telling everyone not to worry…’these aren’t the risks you’re looking for’…’stay invested’…’things are getting better’…

Such is the nature of the institutionalised financial world.

READ MORE